Thank you for your comments. What I miss though: you take 1 critic (Kleiman) and put all effort in focusing on that. Meanwhile I debunk literally everything you say about EVERY legal case, about EVERY Craig Wright credibility question and about EVERY forgery that you bring you bring up to try cover it all up under some disingenous takes that make no sense when you take the "real" evidence, But again, you willingly choose to ignore all that. Sad to watch, ZeMing.

And on top of that, you falsely claim there is 1,000s of pieces of proof. There is none however, and I asked you to show 1 of these 1,000s (which you can't, because it doesn't exist).